Filtered by:. Previous template Next. HB Kenyon. Will the following command work in Windows 10? PRL" If not, then what is the alternative? Tags: None. Albert Richheimer. Kernighan, P. Plauger Comment Post Cancel. Michael Mattias. I wonder if that's not from one of those programs originally written years ago and never seriously rewritten for today's technology. Eric Pearson. If I were still an Admin I'd delete your post, Micheal.
Paul Purvis. Brice Manuel. Tags: None. Theo Gottwald. Lets wait and be surprised. Comment Post Cancel. Originally posted by Theo Gottwald View Post. Steve Rossell. Originally posted by Brice Manuel View Post. You actually got one signed?
I ordered one but received a regular one. I am guessing they ran out of signed copies by the time they got to me. Since PB 10 just got an "official" announcement , I thought now would be the ideal time to plug the shiny new version of PB to him when he was moaning about VB the other day. He asked if there were hardcopy manuals available, but I told him I didn't think they had been released yet.
Originally posted by Steve Rossell View Post. The manual availability date is in the hands of our supplier. We expect to have them in about a month. David Boytor. In the meantime the help file contains all the same information as the manual and can even be printed. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
I Agree. Login or Sign Up. Logging in By logging into your account, you agree to our Privacy Policy , personal data processing and storage practices as described therein. Remember me. Log in. Forgot password or user name? PowerBasic 10 - Manuals. Posts Latest Activity Photos. Page of 2. Filtered by:. Previous 1 2 template Next. Brice Manuel. Originally posted by Tom Hanlin View Post. The concept is interesting, but at the end this will only work if somebody makes a completely new IDE.
I also have a lot of ideas what could be added to PowerBasic, it happens if you use a tool for some time. Don't turn my words around, Bob. For the price it has and the licencing, PureBasic is an possibly unbeatable collection of libraries combined with an great Marco Assembler. Seeing the shortcomings that i told you before, its in my opinion not really a complete "compiler".
For this the second Pass is missing, and some very BASIC things Its built on some sort of Middleware to be able to compile to many different environments. But its architectural shortcomings are just nasty for people coming from a really complete compiler - and that is PowerBasic.
You don't use really fast CALL Thats up to you. Then you will be quite happy with PureBaisc Note that i will delete insults from Postings, or delete missleading postings, but i will not block you or anybody for that you believe that "PureBasic" is the last word in Computerprogramming". Thats your good right. Even i would like to have more enthusiastic PureBasic people here in the Forum.
So we could start exchange sollutions to the builtin shortcomings. Because anyway PureBasic has advantages in its libraries, its a strong Macro-Assembler with some compiler-features, and it "compiles" on x64 and multiple other systems.
For that price it has thats definitely an good offer. Which programming system does not have anywhere such people who slow down the train? They are anywhere i guerss. Also at PowerBasic we always had some of these " XY And i believe that nobody will go back into the reverse direction. The whole thing with PureBasic reminds me to PowerBasic 7 or more years ago. All Sollutions were there. Jose already made a superb Editor, gave them perfect include files.
They would just had to incorporate this stuff and concentrate on doing their Job. Making a good compiler and possibly for x Instead they continued to build the wheel a second time and of course never reached the quality of Jose's work.
Fred could just implement these ready made "preProcessor" based sollutions into the compiler and this would not be a lot of work. For the user its completely transparent, if there is internally an Preprocessor or not. The second Pass The FOR.. NEXT Loop? Transparently for the user. All this is not an technical problem. Its just "Fred doesn't like it".
There is anotehr thing that you see in the PureBasic Forums. This was at eaxctly that time when Fred stopped the further "thinking ahead" and started to concentrate on SpiederBasic. Then many people were going away from PureBasic. A lot of Projects in the forum are dropped at that time.
0コメント